- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 17:15:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Some sensitivity to the line thickness is probably desirable. If we used gaps as in your second example when the underline is a hairline, they'll look much too wide; a fine underline should come much closer to the glyph descenders. But some kind of limit to the gap width is probably good, so that it doesn't grow ridiculously wide. (Although IMO using skip-ink with very thick decorations probably isn't a great idea anyway.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4493#issuecomment-551176190 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2019 17:15:21 UTC