- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:01:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks. These all seem to be in the right sections, which is great. However, to help evaluated spec coverage more precisely, it would be helpful to split the `<wpt>` tags into smaller ones place them at the end of the relevant paragraph, rather than at the end of the section. Also, sometimes a test may exercise statements in two or more paragraphs. When that is the case, I think it is good practice to list the test in the `<wpt>` tag after both paragraphs: * this gives a better picture of the coverage * if at a later time, the editor modifies some paragraph of the specification, they should check the related tests to see if they need to be updated to. This works best if the tests can be found next to all the spec statements they verify. However, this is just my take on this. @tabatkins or @fantasai, you're co-editing this spec. Do you agree, or would you rather merge this PR as is, or do you have some other preference? -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3977#issuecomment-496390510 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2019 07:01:51 UTC