- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 23:51:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Um, good point. :) Updated text: ``` For <a>intrinsic size contributions</a>, ''fit-content(<<length>>)'' behaves as the resulting length; ''fit-content(<<percentage>>)'' behaves as ''width/min-content'' for <a>min-content contributions</a>, and as ''width/max-content'' for <a>max-content contributions</a>. ``` > I'm still unsure about whether it's really a good solution for values that do have a `<percentage>` part, although it is simple. I'm open to suggestions, but in the absence of a clear benefit for another behavior, I think consistency with `auto` is a good principle to follow. So imho we'd need a) a solid proposal and b) use cases to justify any divergence. I don't have either atm... -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3731#issuecomment-493269196 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2019 23:51:33 UTC