- From: Simon Pieters via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 22:30:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
zcorpan has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-sizing] Define a term like "uses fit-content inline sizing" (like floats) == For https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4143 I tried to define that buttons size in the inline direction like floats do, i.e. "shink-to-fit" (CSS 2.2 terminology) or "shrink-wrap" (HTML used this terminology until I changed it in that PR now), if the inline-size is auto. It seems reasonable to define a term that means exactly this, that can be used by floats, abspos, `button`s, `legend`s, and whatever else uses this behavior. In IRC, @dbaron said > I think it would be reasonable to define the term as "uses fit-content inline sizing" or something like that. (It's also nice when the term matches a name in author-exposed syntax like fit-content.) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3928 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 13 May 2019 22:30:31 UTC