- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:08:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@MatsPalmgren That's definitely one idea: it allows you to still have the full flexibility of the `maxmin()` function and keywords, because you separate out the "how many columns" calculation from the "adjusting the final width" calculation. To make that separation clearer, maybe the `<fixed-breadth>` parameter could be included as a function version of `auto-fit`/`-fill`: ```css repeat(auto-fit(<fixed-breadth>), <track-list>); repeat(auto-fill(<fixed-breadth>), <track-list>); repeat(auto-fit(100px), 1fr); /* fit as many columns as would be possible at 100px width, then adjust each to equal width so long as none are less than min-content */ repeat(auto-fit(100px), minmax(0,1fr)); /* ignore the min-content requirement to make them strictly equal */ ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3767#issuecomment-477348344 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2019 21:08:27 UTC