W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] pseudo-algorithm refers to "track size", terminology not already used in the spec (#3649)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:42:27 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-472505520-1552495346-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `pseudo-algorithm refers to "track size", terminology not already used in the spec`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept the change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3649 (refer to columns not tracks)`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> tOPIC: pseudo-algorithm refers to "track size", terminology not already used in the spec<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3649<br>
&lt;dael> rachelandrew: Reading spec with authors. This is the first time track size mentioned in spec. Aim was to unify how sizing works but tracks isn't useful for multicol. Wanted to bring up since it was added with a resolution. I put sample wording in the issue<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Not changing effect of resolution, just hte term?<br>
&lt;dael> rachelandrew: Yeah<br>
&lt;dael> florian: I've looked at that and if you assume tracks=columns it's clear but if you leave the two terms it confuses everything<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections?<br>
&lt;fantasai> sgtm<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept the change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3649 (refer to columns not tracks)<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3649#issuecomment-472505520 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2019 16:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:45 UTC