- From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 00:55:13 -0000
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Peter Linss <plinss@csswg.org>, Eric Willigers <ewilligers@gmail.com>, public-css-archive@w3.org
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 23:40:40 +0000, Alan Stearns wrote:
> Let me suggest that if you want to contribute to a group
> you are a stranger to, you should consider the opinions of
> the people in the group. Ask questions instead of making
> statements. Find useful things to do before raising a
> fuss. And if how a group operates isn't to your taste,
> find somewhere else to be.
>
> It was rude for you to complain that things were not
> happening according to your personal sense of schedule.
>
> It is rude now that you are wasting our time on the
> response below. There's nothing useful for us or for you
> in this.
>
> I am not going to ban you from participating just yet, but
> I'm perfectly happy to if you keep arguing. And given
> how you've conducted yourself here I plan to hold any
> future contributions from you under very strict scrutiny.
> We aren't interested in anything you've added to the
> discussion in this pull request or in this note.
Luckily, I had already done something [else] that is useful:
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3690
2019 February 28 04:53:xx -0000
[css-tables-3] Remove file `debug.log'
Maybe in 6 months I'll ping another request for review, unless
of course it's still under strict scrutiny, in which case I'll
just wait indefinitely for that junk file to be removed.
But, let me take your advice and ask a question or 2 (other than
"Why did you delete my comment?", which I already asked):
Why have you deigned to be so gracious?
Why not just ban me now and get that
sweet, sweet, intoxicating thrill
of dominating
Authority?
Sincerely,
Michael Witten
Received on Saturday, 2 March 2019 01:05:50 UTC