- From: Tom Lowenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:31:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Agreeing to solve [passive fingerprinting] needs to be a wide consensus, not a bunch of ad hoc and inconsistent decisions made in different working groups to different standards. David, I think I have the opposite expectations about what approach we should take. I believe that the only practical way to address passive fingerprinting is standard-by-standard and implementation-by-implementation doing the in-the-weeds work to ensure that passive fingerprinting surface isn't exposed. But I definitely agree with you about the need for broad consensus. Good news, though: that one's already taken care of! People almost-universally agree that they don't want to be silently tracked across the web. It's not just consensus, it's basically unanimous. Now it's our job to implement that for everyone. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tomlowenthal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4055#issuecomment-505521792 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2019 16:31:08 UTC