- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:09:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, you're right, I had the table wrong; I was working too quickly and got the defaults backwards. I guess the table should be: | value | length | fragmented context, not last fragment | fragmented context, last fragment | continuous context | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `auto` | constrained | no | no | no | | `auto` | unconstrained | no | yes* | yes | | `balance` | any | no | yes | yes | | `balance-all` | any | yes | yes | yes | If you agree this is correct, then maybe instead of the wording change I propose, it would be better to move that extra paragraph into the definition of `auto`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4036#issuecomment-503648397 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2019 17:09:24 UTC