W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Don't expand flexible tracks under a min-content constraint (#3683)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:19:54 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-503630576-1560961193-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Don't expand flexible tracks under a min-content constraint`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3683`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Don't expand flexible tracks under a min-content constraint<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3683<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Case where spec forgot to consider min content correctly. Impl do logical and don't expand track to take up space. hcanging spec to match impl and do thing you expect which is size to smaller end when under min-content constraint.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: If you can shrink something down without overflow then min-content constraint should be that amount and not bigger. spec violated concept, impl did correct. Trying to match them up<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Any comment? I not you asked for TabAtkins or Rossen_ to comment<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I'd prefer to get their +<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I'll review shortly<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Resolve or wait?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I trust fantasai so resolve. If I find a mistake I'll say something<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: On the same page. Proposed doesn't seem crazy, just need to look at overall algo fit. I'm sure fantasai spent more cycles so I trust her<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Other comments?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections to this change?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3683<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: All three of these look like they need tests or need tests verified. Have ther ebeen any?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: None in wpt yet. I'll check with oriol and he might know more<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: TabAtkins as you review can you check in tests?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Sounds good<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Once we have tests anything to keep us from updating CR?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Prob tests for other things. I think most that should be fixed is but there might be one or two not.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: I suspect no DoC yet.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Right. Bulk of work is that and changes section<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Anything else on grid?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I'm going to say no<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3683#issuecomment-503630576 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2019 16:19:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:31:10 UTC