- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:04:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@cbiesinger Well, the flex container has a definite cross size, sure. Wrt the flex item itself... If it's not stretched, then it's not definite and would fall through E as I described above. If it is stretched... then you're right, we'd fall into B. The flex base size would be calculated from the cross size, which is max([container cross size], 5px), which is usually 5px. So let's assume 5px as the inner cross size. Transferred through the aspect ratio gives us a flex base size of 5px, and the image maintains its 1:1 aspect ratio. Basically, same result. I suppose the issue here is that “cross size” is not clarified as to whether it's the “used cross size” or the value of the cross size property? It should definitely be the used cross size that's used in this calculation, so that the max is taken into account. Lmk if this is the issue, or if there's something else. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736#issuecomment-501817191 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2019 18:04:57 UTC