- From: Ilya Streltsyn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 13:08:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Don't we have the same situation here that we already had with `justify-content` and `align-*` properties defined in both [css-flexbox-1] and [css-align-3] simultaneously? IMHO, that precedent already showed some problems of such approach: it's really confusing, for both authors and implementors, and this confusion might lead to things like the infamous incomplete (Grid-only) implementation of new box alignment values in Blink. What currently prevents moving the definition and replacing it with reference, as @meyerweb suggests? Is it the fact that [css-align-3] hasn't reached the CR status yet, unlike [css-break-3]? If so, maybe it would be better to speed up promoting [css-align-3] to CR and then moving the definition to it? -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3641#issuecomment-498249098 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 June 2019 13:08:29 UTC