- From: James Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 07:47:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I dunno if any engine implementors are here but is there any reason browsers have at not least implemented the partial version of just `:has(>` and `:has(+`? This would solve a lot of developer's use cases while still leaving the door open for `:has(descendentSelector)` if it proves feasible. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Jamesernator Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3925#issuecomment-516737901 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2019 07:47:53 UTC