- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:15:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
A couple notes: - Can you rebase these changes on top of the latest from master? (or just merge in master for now, then squash when the PR is accepted) It makes it hard to review if there are irrelevant changes. E.g., [you're deleting non-SVG instructions re `contentRect`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4150/files#diff-fc4cc4fe5e6535f140c79bbdd1dbabc8L309), is that intentional? - There should be a note/issue somewhere that the behavior is currently not defined for SVG elements without CSS layout boxes, with a link to w3c/svgwg#713, maybe mentioning as a warning to authors that current implementations return the bounding box values. - I think @atanassov [wanted the spec to be explicit](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4032#issuecomment-510137495) about which SVG elements _do_ have CSS layout box (and therefore should behave as for other CSS boxes). I don't think that needs to be normative, but it would be useful to have in a note. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4150#issuecomment-514742383 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2019 18:16:00 UTC