- From: Rachel Andrew via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:48:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> "Perhaps the request should be that, in the absence of finer granularity queries, @supports should return false unless the implementation support exists in all usage contexts." That might be a bit more useful, however then there is a property and value that the author knows is supported, but seems to be returning false. At that point we are asking them to understand all possible contexts in which that property vould be used. The fragmentation properties are probably better to look at here than gaps, which are likely to be implemented - say if we did a specific masonry layout or something. At the moment a property like `break-before: avoid` is specified for multicol, paged media, and regions. Assuming a wonderful world in which the property was supported in multicol and paged media, regions is a long way off, and probably won't happen in the current form. Which would mean that testing for break-* properties would be useless for the foreseeable future, as we don't have Regions so it can't be implemented in them. Most authors aren't even going to know about Regions and therefore why the property is returning false. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rachelandrew Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3559#issuecomment-458118554 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 28 January 2019 12:48:41 UTC