- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:46:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
MatsPalmgren has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-align] editorial: typos in §10. Appendix A: Static Position Terminology == https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#staticpos-rect > The static positions of a block-level box are defined in [CSS2] Chapter 10 Is the plural "positions" intentional? If so, it's not clear to me what it means. I think the term you're looking for is "static position" (or "static position rectangle"). (this occurs in Block Layout and Inline Layout) > static positionCSS2§10.6.4). Looks like it was meant to be a link? (under Block Layout) > and positioned at its inline-start static position Is missing a period to end the sentence. (under Inline Layout) > See [[!css-flexbox-1#abspos-items]]. Looks like it was meant to be a link? (under Flex Layout) > ... the grid-placement properties instead establishes its static position rectangle. The phrasing seems odd to me. Shouldn't the "instead" be at the end? (under Grid Layout) > See [[!css-grid-1#static-position]]. Looks like it was meant to be a link? (under Grid Layout) It seems all direct links to a CSS2 section here goes to https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/... I think it would be better to link to https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS22/... instead, since the former displays a big red warning box. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3548 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2019 00:46:51 UTC