- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 03:01:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
This spec is not my main area of expertise, so I'll refrain from commenting on the substance until I've studied it further, but a comment on the form: usually things are much easier to process when there's one "issue" per github issue. If you want to have a master issue that links to all of them, that's fine, and we can cross link as needed, but splitting each topic into its own issue lets the CSSWG get to the bottom of each one by one, track their status independently, assign them, schedule them for discussion in teleconfs, etc. I've reposted each point from @stefsullrew's comment (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3467#issuecomment-453678965) into separate issues: * Access Control: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3506 * Limited ::theme selector: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3507 * Web Component default *exportparts=*: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3508 * Dynamic *exportparts=*: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3509 * ::part* and *::before* and *::after* pseudo elements: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3510 -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3467#issuecomment-453892283 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 03:01:15 UTC