Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] background-position definition doesn't reflect reality. (#3501)

> Is there any plan to avoid supporting the three-value positions in `background-position` as well?

No - three-value position [usage](https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/2001) in background-position is about 5%.

>  do you know which syntax does background-position-* accept in Blink?

All browsers support the Level 3 spec grammar for background-position - see [wpt.fyi](https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-backgrounds/parsing?label=master&label=stable&aligned).

Tests should be added for the Level 4 grammar and for background-position-x / background-position-y.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3501#issuecomment-453301757 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 23:34:35 UTC