[csswg-drafts] More WPT reviewers needed (#3496)

ewilligers has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== More WPT reviewers needed ==
_Note a [helpful tip](https://github.com/orgs/web-platform-tests/teams/reviewers/discussions/2) that foolip circulated recently: Filter email by cc `review_requested@noreply.github.com` to see pull requests where you have been added as a reviewer._

It would be helpful if some people could volunteer as test reviewers for various CSS specs. Examples:

A trivial css-overflow [test](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/13109) from September has no [reviewer](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-overflow/META.yml) feedback.

A trivial css-rhythm [test](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/13572) from October has no [reviewer](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-rhythm/META.yml) feedback.

A trivial compositing [test](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/13575) from October has no [reviewer](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/compositing/META.yml) feedback.

A trivial css-backgrounds [test](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/13688) from October has no [reviewer](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-backgrounds/META.yml) feedback. Other [tests](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Acss-backgrounds) date back further.

A css-overscroll-behavior [test](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/13873) from November has no feedback from the lone [reviewer](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-overscroll-behavior/META.yml).






Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3496 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2019 06:12:27 UTC