- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:20:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I prefer (A) since it's simpler than (C). I don't really see any benefit of (C) that warrants the added complexity. (B) seems tricky to implement since `<li value=N>` would need to be mapped to `counter-set:list-item N; counter-increment:list-item INC` where `INC` is ±1 depending on the `reversed` attribute of the nearest `ul/ol/menu` ancestor, which looks difficult to compute for us at the point where we map attributes to style. Also, the final computed value will be `counter-increment:list-item -1 list-item 1` in that case which looks weird. Fwiw, I implemented (A) and it was fairly straight-forward. -- GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3686#issuecomment-468479097 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2019 23:20:28 UTC