- From: Matthew Dean via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:09:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I mean, I guess what I'm saying is: why attach the namespace to an arbitrary attribute, instead of defining an attribute where one can attach (select) namespaces? I mean, I get that you're trying to use existing syntax, but I guess to me, this syntax is just hard to follow. It also clashes with libraries like Vue (and Ractive?) which use XML-namespace-like attributes to change attribute behaviors. Which of course was dangerous on their part, but... I think also XML namespacing on an attribute isn't supposed to define the tree behaviors, is it? There just seem to be a lot of semantic and counter-intuitive oddities with this particular syntax direction. -- GitHub Notification of comment by matthew-dean Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4061#issuecomment-525067671 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 August 2019 23:09:22 UTC