- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:00:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `counter(name, none) should be invalid`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Update to match 2.1 and make counter(name, none) invalid` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: counter(name, none) should be invalid<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4163<br> <dael> fantasai: If you say counter(name,counter-style) it represents list using that. There is a none value that's value of list-style-type. Some impl think that's valid as a counter style. CSS 2.1 forbids that. I updated spec to match css2.1<br> <dael> fantasai: If people disagree and think counter(name, none) should be valid we can reconsider<br> <dael> TabAtkins: I wrote that near 10 years ago. Can't comment on [missed] so whatever<br> <TabAtkins> s/[missed]/justification<br> <dael> fantasai: Objections to updating spec to match 2.1?<br> <TabAtkins> No objection.<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Update to match 2.1 and make counter(name, none) invalid<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4163#issuecomment-521331100 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2019 17:00:51 UTC