- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:32:29 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Specify fallback behavior when replaced or background image content not available`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Specify fallback behavior when replaced or background image content not available<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1984<br> <jensimmons> there might be clarifications needed about wavy and double lines…. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4134 fantasai was tasked with working on the spec.<br> <TabAtkins> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/3f884b87c54b38afd7742fb8e123a7d27ddd3ac4<br> <dael> TabAtkins: When we spoke last time waiting on Apple; myles wanted to review. fantasai committed text for replaced image. Want to ensure spec did not rule out leaving image in place while waiting for new image<br> <fantasai> jensimmons, for the record, I think what I was actioned to write was that the line thickness, amplitude, and frequency should scale together (not necessarily strictly proportionally, but roughly proportionally), and double simlar to border-width: double in the same way<br> <dael> TabAtkins: If Apple wants to review that's fine but want to do soonish<br> <dael> myles: Can I give myself an end of week deadline?<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Next call is fine.<br> <dael> Rossen_: Next week's call is fine. TabAtkins anything else on this?<br> <dael> TabAtkins: It's good<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1984#issuecomment-521320685 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2019 16:32:31 UTC