- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 07:15:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> <dael> fantasai: Sympathetic that we impl and shipped. Just to note again, Mozilla's implementation did *not* ship yet. It will be in Firefox 70. See https://bugzil.la/1567282. I personally now think, "width" would be better for consistency reasons, though I'd be fine to stay with "thickness", too. I assume, most authors nowadays are using IDEs, which have autocompletion of property names, so that should mitigate the problem, anyway. As [Christoph mentioned](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4138#issuecomment-517195456), there might also be a property specifying how wide a text decoration line protrudes the text at some point, but I believe authors rather associate the "width" of a line with the thickness due to the other properties using that word. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4138#issuecomment-520125862 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2019 07:16:01 UTC