- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 23:01:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> ??? My reaction, too. But per [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candela_per_square_metre) “Nit (nt) is a non-SI name also used for [a candela per square metre] (1 nt = 1 cd/m2). The term nit is believed to come from the Latin word nitere, to shine.” I would not normally consider that specialized usage a conflict with the colloquial meaning of "nit" as "minor bug, like a louse", as in "nit-picking". But if if confused a native English speaker like Simon, no harm, it could certainly confuse non-native speakers who work with computer graphics but not with English idioms. ___________ All of which isn't relevant to @BillGoldstein's original suggestions, which makes good points, but is a bit of a mixture of items that need to be addressed separately. @tabatkins, can you follow up on the typos? For the `-webkit-` fill and stroke properties, we should probably discuss them in combination with the standard `fill` and `stroke`, maybe as part of #3855, about handling SVG. There, I suggested using a `fill: currentColor` for SVG, but a `revert` could also work in that case. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3860#issuecomment-487326052 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2019 23:01:08 UTC