- From: Christian Biesinger via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:00:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
But that's not what I'm concerned about (and anyway, why would we fall down to that?) If we have a replaced item, for the min-size calculation, we do: main size = min(cross size, min-cross size) * aspect ratio For the flex base size, we do: main size = cross size * aspect ratio Shouldn't that be consistent? -- GitHub Notification of comment by cbiesinger Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736#issuecomment-484688102 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2019 21:00:21 UTC