- From: Ryosuke Niwa via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:06:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I don't see that this blocks moving forward unless you think we will regret adding the string-API in the future. I would prefer to go with no IDL attributes than block on designing DOMTokenMap. I'm sure you don't but we do. > But we haven't done a good job getting those partners to speak up to the CSSWG on this repository. We can work on that, which can help steer the discussion. If nothing else, several of them will be attending TPAC. I don't think that kind of voicing would affect our overall objection to the current proposal. > If necessary, we can also break off features which need more data into a separate incubation repository and spec. Then we can work on shipping them and gathering in-the-field data on their usefulness. I think we would be a lot more willing to show our support if we got rid of the part forwarding and focused on the rest because the rest is completely uncontroversial. Heck, we might be able to *implement* the rest in a couple of days by hooking it up to our existing pseudo element mechanism we have. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rniwa Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2368#issuecomment-425279989 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 00:07:01 UTC