- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:47:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I don’t understand why a .notdef glyph is considered to be an acceptable fallback Because all fonts are required to have one. > Isn’t it commonly a square shape instead? No, it is typically a rectangle (and, I think, typically uses the default advance width) >> It is recommended that the shape of the .notdef glyph be either an empty rectangle, a rectangle with a question mark inside of it, or a rectangle with an “X”. Creative shapes, like swirls or other symbols, may not be recognized by users as indicating that a glyph is missing from the font and is not being displayed at that location. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3135#issuecomment-425163311 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2018 16:47:08 UTC