Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position][css-sticky] Scrolling ancestor should probably include overflow:hidden even when content doesn't overflow

@stephenmcgruer 
> The fact that this is here implies (to me) that overflow: hidden is not automatically considered having a scrolling mechanism.

Agreed, spec language needs to be cleaned up, clearer, and honestly made to be in line with current implementations. This still seems to be a near duplicate of the reasons/discussion for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/865, though so many of these issues have a lot of crossover.

Any idea on how to move these issues forward? Or to even get an idea about when these issues may be tackled?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jonjohnjohnson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3083#issuecomment-421466709 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 14 September 2018 19:51:43 UTC