- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:01:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think the point of confusion is that you're evaluating whether the item is in a cyclic layout situation within the scope of a particular step in the algorithm. Within such a narrow scope, you get different answers depending on which step you're in. But the decision of whether an item can be baseline-aligned or not due to cyclic dependencies is at the top level. If any part of the layout creates this cycle, the cycle exists, and you must use fallback alignment--and that fallback alignment applies as if it were originally specified, not only in certain steps. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3046#issuecomment-420023850 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 10 September 2018 19:01:18 UTC