- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 03:18:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for the feedback. > I'm not sure exactly what the protocol for suggesting changes to the committee is You're following it perfectly: civil discussion in this github repo is the way it's done. > Someone writes an authoritative article [...] They link to the [...] standard [...] Anyone questioning the [...] disparity [...] is silenced. Do you think it would help if there was some wording in the standard, not just for the `pointer` value but for the whole property, that says even though many values are described in terms of what they mean and not just what they look like, this is meant to be descriptive, and does not restrict authors from using them in other contexts if they feel it would be appropriate? Or maybe just a note next to the pointer value that "This value is commonly, although not universally, used by authors to indicate all clickable targets, rather than just links". -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1936#issuecomment-419309846 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 September 2018 03:18:58 UTC