- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:30:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> that suggests one should be using functions to contain the grammars instead Yeah, I kind of acknowledged that in my next sentence. It was just getting difficult to mentally parse some of the examples people were presenting earlier in the thread. I was sort of cheating by using brackets without a function name, but I agree with > functions give names to the functionality, which makes them easier to recognize and search for. That said, I'm concerned about reusing `calc()` if we're also going to add a context-specific token. So my vote would be for `rel()` or `adjust()` or something like that. But I still like the idea of having a token for the current variable, to clearly distinguish `rel(s + 20%)` from `rel(s*20%)`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3187#issuecomment-429983465 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 15 October 2018 19:30:10 UTC