- From: inoas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:39:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Great idea! What about other selectors and matching them? ```css @supports selector(<) { // use imaginary future < selector } else @supports selector(:visible) { // use imaginary future :visible selector } else { // use some conventional selector } ``` p.s.: no endorsement for those imaginary selectors -- GitHub Notification of comment by inoas Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3207#issuecomment-429420901 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 October 2018 18:39:38 UTC