- From: inoas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:39:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Great idea!
What about other selectors and matching them?
```css
@supports selector(<) {
// use imaginary future < selector
} else @supports selector(:visible) {
// use imaginary future :visible selector
} else {
// use some conventional selector
}
```
p.s.: no endorsement for those imaginary selectors
--
GitHub Notification of comment by inoas
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3207#issuecomment-429420901 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 October 2018 18:39:38 UTC