Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shadow-parts] confirm browser support

Also agree on no named setters. We have the `maplike<>` declaration for handling this in a *much* better fashion. (Otherwise, what's the behavior of creating a part named, say, `__proto__`? That's a valid CSS ident!)

I'm fine with there being no IDL attribute yet; `getAttribute()` suffices to get the string value.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2368#issuecomment-427463813 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 5 October 2018 18:47:46 UTC