Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-3] opacity should use <<number>> not <<alphavalue>> “which is syntactically a <<number>>” from Chris Lilley via GitHub on 2018-11-13 (public-css-archive@w3.org from November 2018)

From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:06:44 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-438322133-1542125203-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

It seems desirable (for readability, for cross-spec linking and consistency) to say that something is an `&lt;alphavalue.`. Can't we just (continue to) define the term, and the definition is `<number> | <percentage>` ? Would that still work for animation to be correctly defined?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3139#issuecomment-438322133 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2018 16:06:46 UTC