- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 20:24:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
`font` isn't a particularly relevant example; it *has* to have a font-family in it, and that value *has* to be last, so it's generally "positionally unambiguous". (There are exceptions to this; if the font-family is "Bold New Font", then `font: italic 300px Bold New Font` could potentially be parsed as a bold version of "New Font" or as a normal version of "Bold New Font". But it's usually true, unlike the `animation` example.) > FWIW, Firefox has been shipping the feature using this syntax for several years, and I don't think I heard any breakage caused by this change. I'm extremely convinced by this argument and thus am fine with it. ^_^ -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2624#issuecomment-393667875 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2018 20:24:32 UTC