- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:44:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `Allow division of same types in calc()`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Allow division of same types in calc()<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/545<br> <dael> astearns: Looks like there's a change for this<br> <dael> TabAtkins: I think all that's left is...I wanted review by WG<br> <dael> TabAtkins: I added the resolution from months ago to allow unit algebra in calc(). dbaron gave me review which I hadn't seen yet. I'll resolve those. Any other comments or concerns please let me know. It's i n the spec<br> <dael> frremy: I'm wondering how you decided the final unit value of a calc. You prob have to back track. I think we have to change how we do this. Seems fine by me, but it requires keeping track of more things<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Yep, how to determine type it resolves to is in the spec and you need the algo to do Typed OM. I leaned on Typed OM as much as possible b/c I think I got it right<br> <dael> chris: This is the correct thing to do. It's compat with typed OM we should do this.<br> <dael> astearns: This edits is a result of a resolution?<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Yes. We've had multiple resolutions to do this. dbaron found one in 2014. this is just a review request.<br> <chris> 2014, wow<br> <dael> astearns: Sounds like dbaron looked. chris and frremy are okay. I think we're good. Anyone else wanting to look please do.<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/545#issuecomment-393231774 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2018 16:44:22 UTC