- From: Daniel Tonon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 22:03:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@fantasai I made a `normal` version of the diagram so that the `normal` description in the spec wouldn't look like the odd one out  **Note:** There are a couple of mistakes in the editors draft. > **if its column-gap were normal:** > ...without any special adjustment, thus stretching to **175px** wide... It should say 150px wide. 175px wide is the width it would be with zero gap. > **if its column-gap were 75px:** > ...as if it had a **-37.5px** right margin, thus stretching to 87.5px wide... > ...as if it had a **-37.5px** left margin, thus stretching to 137.5px wide... These should actually be positive margins of 12.5px. No margin is what you get on `normal`. **Negative** margin is what you get if the grid-gap is **_less than_** the parent grid-gap. **Positive** margin is what you get if the grid-gap is **_greater than_** the parent grid-gap. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Dan503 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2285#issuecomment-391510887 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2018 22:03:45 UTC