Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display] 'flow' inner display type should never establish a BFC

The Working Group just discussed `'flow' inner display type should never establish a BFC`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: 'flow' inner display type should never establish a BFC<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020<br>
&lt;Rossen> chris, thx :)<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Comment ^<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: We made an edit [reads]<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: We believe this is editorial and we wanted to flag the WG to confirm it's editorial<br>
&lt;dael> [everyone reads]<br>
&lt;dbaron> I think this may be hard to know until somebody tries implementing this...<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: You're saying a block container establishing a new fc inner display is flow root<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Used inner display of flow root<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Unless multicol?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I don't htink we have a display type for multi col. It would presumably have same. We're not changing computed value, jsut used. Currently that's just a concept. Only effect of flow root is it establishes a BFC.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: I think multicol is desc as establishing BFC and I think I filed a bug saying that's weird.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Editorial part seems fine<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: I'll re-read the spec for multicol.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: This particular one seems good<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Multicol is difficult because it's a new type of FC. It's not really BFC but there's no display that aligns to it.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I'm wondering what dbaron is concerned about<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: I just think...I'm not aware of an impl and I think it's complicated and there will be side effects you discover once anybody tries to impl<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: atm I think no effect on impl. Only time it will start to have an effect is if we start to expose used values through OM<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: AS it stands...<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: That's the intent. If there's a different effect on impl it's not editorial<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: atm it's editorial because there's no impl<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Objections to accepting the proposal https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-391413557 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2018 16:32:18 UTC