- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:57:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If there was an obvious “best choice” for how to size those tracks @tabatkins and I think it would be fine to make the second argument of repeat() optional (so you could just say `repeat(12)`). However, we don't think there is one: in particular, it's not clear whether `1fr` or `minmax(0, 1fr)` or even `auto` would be more desirable in general. Note, part of the problem with verbosity here is stemming from problems with `1fr`'s automatic minimum, which is too aggressive and results in authors wanting to use `minmax(0, 1fr)` a lot more often than is ideal. If we can fix the automatic minimum per https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1865 (which we'd like to resolve if we can just figure out the Web-compat impact), then that, at least, should become less of an issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2270#issuecomment-390050226 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2018 23:57:49 UTC