Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-2] Allow minmax where max wins over min

The Working Group just discussed `Allow minmax where max wins over min`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: add a feature that allows max to win over min in Grid L2, name tbd`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Allow minmax where max wins over min<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1102<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Someone brought a use case where they want to set up columns that are like 20% of the grid but no larger then 250px. Obvious way doesn't work the way thtey want because min wins over max. If viewport is large the min will win and it'll be >250. They want priority to min.<br>
&lt;Rossen_> what if we call it maxmin<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Seems reasonable. We chose min win over match because it matches CSS> Reasonable to want different order. Suggestion is to add some way to achieve that in grid L2.<br>
&lt;Rossen_> meaning max wins vs minmax where min wins?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: We can decide on the functionality addition and not the syntax. It's a minor change to layout algo. THere will need to be a check to say if it's this type of sizing you cna't go above this value.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Support adding. Did we resolve on using maxmin?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I don't want maxmin because it suggests max comes first in argument. We can figure syntax out later. fantasai and I will recommend something.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: The feature request makes sense.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Opinions? Reasons not to put this in grid l2?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Objections to adding a feature that allows max to win over min in Grid L2?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: add a feature that allows max to win over min in Grid L2, name tbd<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1102#issuecomment-389577291 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2018 16:13:44 UTC