- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 17:11:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Loirooriol has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values] Resolution of math functions == >From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-notation, > A math function can be used wherever `<length>`, `<frequency>`, `<angle>`, `<time>`, `<percentage>`, `<number>`, or `<integer>` values are allowed. >From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-type-checking, > A math function has a resolved type, which is one of `<length>`, `<frequency>`, `<angle>`, `<time>`, `<percentage>`, `<number>`, or `<integer>`. >From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#type-checking-exprs, > A math function resolves to `<length>`, `<angle>`, `<time>`, `<frequency>`, `<resolution>`, `<flex>`, or `<percentage>` according to which of those productions its type matches. Why are `<number>` and `<integer>` in #<!---->1 and #<!---->2 but not in #<!---->3? Why are `<resolution>` and `<flex>` in #<!---->3 but not in #<!---->1 nor #<!---->2? Is it necessary to repeat this list three times? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2665 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2018 17:11:42 UTC