- From: Dirk Schulze via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 19:32:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `the used value for border-box #999`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> topic: [css-transform] the used value for border-box #999<br> 8:57 PM K<krit> Dirk Schulze krit: Just an update from my side. I had the task to check the mapping of content-box, border-box, margin-box, padding-box to SVG compatible boxes in the Masking spec.<br> 8:57 PM krit: all the CSS boxes map to the SVG fill-box in the masking spec.<br> 8:57 PM krit: question was if we can align them to the box mapping from fill and stroke<br> 8:58 PM krit: krit I did some test for clip-path: https://codepen.io/krit/pen/qYrqKy<br> 8:59 PM krit: Currently none of the boxes are implemented, not even fill, stroke, view-box.<br> 8:59 PM krit: properties that use those boxes are: clip-path, mask-origin, mask-clip.<br> 9:00 PM krit: none of that existed in SVG 1.1. So there is no compatibility risk if we change the behavior.<br> 9:00 PM krit: I do not resist to follow fill and stroke for box mapping.<br> 9:01 PM krit: mask-origin, mask-clip might map to CSS boxes in Gecko (needs further checjing) but even those would not create compatibility risk to SVG 1.1<br> 9:02 PM RESOLUTION: : Follow CSS box mapping from Fill and Stroke spec for all specs as decided by the CSS WG already.<br> 9:02 PM RESOLUTION: Follow CSS box mapping from Fill and Stroke spec for all specs as decided by the CSS WG already. </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by dirkschulze Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/999#issuecomment-385765872 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2018 19:32:11 UTC