Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] Allow gradient color stops to have two locations

The Working Group just discussed `Clear gradient color stops with two locations for shipping`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: clear gradient color stops with two locations for shipping`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Clear gradient color stops with two locations for shipping<br>
&lt;ChrisL> q+ to a) express support for dry two-location stops and b) ask whether chrome does computed-value-time fixup or post-layout fixup<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2439<br>
&lt;dael> leaverou: Two weeks ago we cleared conic gradient for shipping. Turns out many conic gradient in the wild were using the two locatiosn. It's been in the draft for 6 years. Chrome impl a year ago because it was in many demos<br>
&lt;dael> leaverou: Dev that impl asked if he can ship it as well. Chrome impl a year ago. I don't see why not.<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: I think it's an obvious good thing.<br>
&lt;dael> leaverou: It's what I said in issue.<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: Question for chrome  folks. THere's a question in the spec as to if fixup applies before or after layout. I don't think that effects this issue.<br>
&lt;dael> leaverou: I don't see why depend on layout<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: There's an issue that says it might<br>
&lt;fantasai> I thought we resolved on that in Tokyo?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Not sure<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: Can you find out?<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: IN general I support this.<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> +1, this is a very useful syntax (especially when using variables in gradients), doesn't involve any new rendering code, only computed value changes.<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: People are using it and it's a trvial extension.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Hearing some support. Other opinions? Esp from Chrome folks who are shipping?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I'm fine with shipping I agree it's minor feature very useful.<br>
&lt;tantek> we have tests?<br>
&lt;fantasai> ChrisL, https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0051.html<br>
&lt;leaverou> tantek: we don't have test for ANYTHING about gradients!<br>
&lt;leaverou> s/test/tests/<br>
&lt;tantek> SMH<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Objections to color stops are extended into their consecutive color stops?<br>
&lt;dael> leaverou: Color stops with two positions<br>
&lt;tantek> so now we're agreeing to ship features based on demoware?<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> It's basically adopt https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-4/#color-stop-syntax<br>
&lt;leaverou> Color stops with two positions are expanded to two consecutive color stops with the same color<br>
&lt;dael> frremy: This is in spec we just have to say fine to ship<br>
&lt;dael> leaverou: Yes.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: I heard no objections.<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: clear gradient color stops with two locations for shipping<br>
&lt;tantek> just WD right?<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2439#issuecomment-376960120 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2018 17:00:26 UTC