W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shadow-parts] decide on forwarding micro-syntax for partmap

From: Ryosuke Niwa via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:25:30 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-376299974-1522095929-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Again, the parsing isn't any harder. This is seriously a non-issue, parsing-wise. Whether or not to use any sort of separator token is purely a matter of making it easier to use/understand. "We don't need it" is a reasonable argument against; "this is hard to parse" is not.

We can continue to agree to disagree on that point.

> Perhaps `a as b, c as d`? The English connector suggests the meaning a little bit more, and has a clearer direction of association.

That has the same semantic ambiguity. One can't tell whether `a` (in a subcomponent) is exposed *as* `b` in the host component, or `b` in the host component is mapped *as* `b` in a subcomponent.

GitHub Notification of comment by rniwa
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2411#issuecomment-376299974 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 20:25:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:26 UTC