Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shadow-parts] decide on forwarding micro-syntax for partmap

@tabatkins @rniwa

I was thinking a bit more about this. The spec allows

a => b, a => c, ...

so should we allow

a => b c, ...

? In which case, I think the  => becomes more helpful and

a b c, ...

really seems hard for humans.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fergald
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2411#issuecomment-376058095 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 06:19:27 UTC