- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:27:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The spec already specifies that "this step recurses", not that the algorithm recurses. The "otherwise" is against the condition that starts step 2, determining which of the two bullet points applies. This is purposely not an ordered sequence of steps (after all, the first bullet point applies to all run-ins, independently of the other two!). However, we've clarified a bit - we now say "this *re-parenting* recurses", to not imply that there are ordered steps, and make the "otherwise" more clearly just negating the previous bullet point, rather than sequencing from it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374384660 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 March 2018 21:27:12 UTC