- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:52:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Also, if this is the working group's policy, I think it would also be helpful to have a list of the specs that have at some point in the past been in CR. We have specs that have been in CR, but that have had very substantial changes since the CR (e.g., ruby and text were last in CR in May 2003; I think some features in them may also have been explicitly cleared to ship). I also think that if we build a list of things that have been cleared to ship, we should make some attempt to make that list exhaustive. There are a bunch of those hidden in meeting minutes in various places over the past decade. And the list of features that are actually shipping is substantially larger than the set of features allowed by the policy as written, and I think much of that was done with the approval of the working group, although perhaps not by the fully formal process laid out [in the snapshot](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-2018/#experimental). (And, hmmm... that section seems to have a bunch of the text that duplicates what @fantasai proposes at the top of this issue.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2388#issuecomment-372845919 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2018 22:53:05 UTC