- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 21:36:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
tabatkins has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-shadow-parts] Let ::theme() penetrate closed shadows == In <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2368#issuecomment-370168953>, Ryosuke comments: > There should be no difference between closed and open shadow trees for ::theme. ::theme should always penetrate shadow boundaries. Otherwise, it defeats the primary use case of ::theme. I would think that letting ::theme() penetrate closed shadows defeats the primary purpose of having a closed shadow in the first place. I'm happy to go either way, tho. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2381 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 3 March 2018 21:36:53 UTC