- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 23:36:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I had some comments in both mozilla/standards-positions#59 and w3ctag/design-reviews#230. I think my biggest concern is that `::part()` and `::theme()` feel too related to each other to have completely unrelated names. (`::theme()` almost feels like a combinator that could be attached to `::part()`.) I'm also a little concerned about the complexity of the part-forwarding microsyntax. I had [one suggestion](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/230#issuecomment-363624986), although I don't know think it actually helps very much. I haven't had much time to dig in to the spec yet, though. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2368#issuecomment-369769342 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 23:36:56 UTC